Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

In re Payne, 16 AP 00543. (2016)

Court: United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois Number: inbco20161102666 Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 27, 2016
Latest Update: Oct. 27, 2016
Summary: FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW JACK B. SCHMETTERER , Bankruptcy Judge . A. The Parties 1. The Plaintiff is Nelson C Payne ("Plaintiff"). 2. The Creditor is Specialized Loan Servicing LLC ("Creditor"). B. Factual Background 1. On or about April 29, 2016, Plaintiff filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code. 2. Plaintiff owns the real estate commonly known as 8010 S. Marshfield Avenue, Chicago, IL 60620. 3. Bank of America holds a first mortgage lien o
More

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

A. The Parties

1. The Plaintiff is Nelson C Payne ("Plaintiff").

2. The Creditor is Specialized Loan Servicing LLC ("Creditor").

B. Factual Background

1. On or about April 29, 2016, Plaintiff filed a petition for relief under Chapter 13 of the Bankruptcy Code.

2. Plaintiff owns the real estate commonly known as 8010 S. Marshfield Avenue, Chicago, IL 60620.

3. Bank of America holds a first mortgage lien on the real property commonly known as 8010 S. Marshfield Avenue, Chicago, IL 60620, with a secured claim of $361,383.00 pursuant to Plaintiff's credit report.

4. The Creditor holds a second mortgage lien on the real property known as 8010 S. Marshfield Avenue, Chicago, IL 60620 in the approximate amount of $55,553.71 pursuant to a proof of claim filed on August 22, 2016.

5. On May 2, 2016, Plaintiff's attorney obtained property comparables which show the value of the property located at 8010 S. Marshfield Avenue, Chicago, IL 60620 to be $106,189.66.

6. The Modified Chapter 13 Plan filed on May 12, 2016, provides that the Plaintiff will make monthly payments to the Chapter 13 Trustee in the amount of $710.00 per month for 60 months.

7. Under the Chapter 13 Plan, general unsecured creditors will be paid 10.00% of their allowed claims.

8. On August 26, 2016, Plaintiff filed an adversary complaint pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) and Bankruptcy Rule 3012 to determine the validity of Creditor's lien on Plaintiff's property located at 8010 S. Marshfield Avenue, Chicago, IL 60620.

9. That on August 26, 2016, a copy of the summons and complaint were served in accordance with Rule 7004 of the Federal Rules of the Bankruptcy Procedure by Certified Mail, postage prepaid to Specialized Loan Servicing LLC, John Beggins, CEO, 8742 Lucent Boulevard, Suite 300, Highlands Ranch, Colorado 80129 and National Registered Agents Inc, 208 S. LaSalle Street, Suite 814, Chicago, IL 60604.

10. To date, no responsive pleading has been filed.

11. No evidence has been presented to challenge the validity of the secured claim that holds priority over the second mortgage lien.

12. No evidence has been presented to challenge the property value of $106,189.66.

13. The first secured claim of Bank of America in the amount of $361,383.00 exhausts the value and equity in Plaintiff's residence.

14. There is no value and equity to support the claim of the Creditor.

CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

A. Jurisdiction

1. This contested matter is a core proceeding pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 157(b)(2)(K). This court has jurisdiction over this matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 157(a) and 1334(b).

2. Venue is proper in this district pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1409.

B. Argument

3. This action was initiated under 11 U.S.C. § 506(a) and F. R. Bankr. P. 3012.

4. The Plaintiff scheduled the first secured lien on the property located at 8010 S. Marshfield Avenue, Chicago, IL 60620 in the amount of $361,383.00, and the second secured lien in the amount of $55,553.71.

5. That the value of Plaintiff's residence is $106,189.66.

6. To the extent that a lien secures a claim against the Plaintiff that is not an allowed secured claim, such lien is void. . ." 11 U.S.C. § 506(d). If a Debtor's chapter 13 case is dismissed then any lien voided under § 506(d) is reinstated. 11 U.S.C. §349(b)(1)(C). Although the Seventh Circuit has not yet considered the issue, the vast majority of circuits hold a wholly unsecured junior mortgage is subject to strip off pursuant to 11 U.S.C. §506(d), notwithstanding the anti-modification protection afforded holders of home mortgages in 11 U.S.C. §1322(b)(2) as implied by Nobelman v. American Savings Bank, 508 U.S. 324 (1993). See Pond v. Farm Specialist Realty (In re Pond), 252 F.3d 122 (2nd Cir. 2001); McDonald v. Master Fin., Inc. (In re McDonald), 205 F.3d 606 (3rd Cir. 2000); In re Bartee, 212 F.3d 277 (5th Cir. 2000); In re Lane, 280 F.3d 663 (6th Cir. 2002); Zimmer v. PSB Lending Corp., 313 F.3d 1220 (9th Cir. 2002); and In re Tanner, 217 F.3d 1357 (11th Cir. 2000).

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer