Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

HIGGINS v. FARR FINANCIAL INC., C 07-02200 JSW. (2011)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20111011a17 Visitors: 14
Filed: Oct. 11, 2011
Latest Update: Oct. 11, 2011
Summary: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. Plaintiff, Howard B. Higgins ("Higgins") and Defendant, Farr Financial Inc. ("Farr"), by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate that this action, having been fully compromised and settled only as to Higgins' claims against Farr, shall be dismissed with prejudice only as to Farr and without costs or attorney fees to either Higgins or Farr as to said claims, and that the Court may enter
More

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE

JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Howard B. Higgins ("Higgins") and Defendant, Farr Financial Inc. ("Farr"), by and through their respective attorneys, stipulate that this action, having been fully compromised and settled only as to Higgins' claims against Farr, shall be dismissed with prejudice only as to Farr and without costs or attorney fees to either Higgins or Farr as to said claims, and that the Court may enter an order of dismissal as to Farr with prejudice on the form attached hereto.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ORDER

Good cause appearing, IT IS ORDERED that the stipulation is GRANTED.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, and this does order, adjudge and decree, that the above-entitled cause be and the same hereby is dismissed with prejudice as to Farr Financial Inc., and without costs or attorney fees to either Howard B. Higgins or Farr Financial Inc.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer