Taber v. Leica Biosystems, Inc., 19-C-381. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20190725736
Visitors: 13
Filed: Jul. 22, 2019
Latest Update: Jul. 22, 2019
Summary: ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT LYNN ADELMAN , District Judge . On June 4, 2019, the court held a scheduling conference in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and Civil L. R. 16(a) (E.D. Wis.). This conference produced a scheduling order that set July 1, 2019, as the deadline for amended pleadings. ECF No. 9 at 1. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on July 1. ECF No. 10. I find that the Plaintiff has appropriately filed his amended complaint in accord
Summary: ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT LYNN ADELMAN , District Judge . On June 4, 2019, the court held a scheduling conference in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and Civil L. R. 16(a) (E.D. Wis.). This conference produced a scheduling order that set July 1, 2019, as the deadline for amended pleadings. ECF No. 9 at 1. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on July 1. ECF No. 10. I find that the Plaintiff has appropriately filed his amended complaint in accorda..
More
ORDER ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO STRIKE PLAINTIFF'S AMENDED COMPLAINT
LYNN ADELMAN, District Judge.
On June 4, 2019, the court held a scheduling conference in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 16 and Civil L. R. 16(a) (E.D. Wis.). This conference produced a scheduling order that set July 1, 2019, as the deadline for amended pleadings. ECF No. 9 at ¶ 1. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint on July 1. ECF No. 10. I find that the Plaintiff has appropriately filed his amended complaint in accordance with the scheduling order. Therefore, I deny Defendant's Motion to Strike and I deny Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply as moot.
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant's Motion to Strike Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint and Defendant's Motion for Leave to File a Reply in Support are DENIED.
Source: Leagle
