KEMPER INDEPENDENCE INSURANCE COMPANY v. BROWN, 14-4081-JTM. (2014)
Court: District Court, D. Kansas
Number: infdco20141110766
Visitors: 19
Filed: Nov. 07, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 07, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. THOMAS MARTEN, District Judge. This case arises from a shooting incident in Topeka, Kansas. Robert Brown, who had a homeowners policy with plaintiff Kemper Insurance, shot defendant Rochelle Chatfield. Brown was later convicted of attempted murder, and is currently incarcerated. Chatfield sued Brown in Shawnee County, Kansas District Court. Kemper offered to defend the suit under a reservation of rights, but Brown refused and did not appear at trial. Chatfield obtained
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. THOMAS MARTEN, District Judge. This case arises from a shooting incident in Topeka, Kansas. Robert Brown, who had a homeowners policy with plaintiff Kemper Insurance, shot defendant Rochelle Chatfield. Brown was later convicted of attempted murder, and is currently incarcerated. Chatfield sued Brown in Shawnee County, Kansas District Court. Kemper offered to defend the suit under a reservation of rights, but Brown refused and did not appear at trial. Chatfield obtained a..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. THOMAS MARTEN, District Judge.
This case arises from a shooting incident in Topeka, Kansas. Robert Brown, who had a homeowners policy with plaintiff Kemper Insurance, shot defendant Rochelle Chatfield. Brown was later convicted of attempted murder, and is currently incarcerated. Chatfield sued Brown in Shawnee County, Kansas District Court. Kemper offered to defend the suit under a reservation of rights, but Brown refused and did not appear at trial. Chatfield obtained a $1.8 million judgment against Brown for negligence.
Kemper instituted the present declaratory judgment action, arguing the policy does not apply under exclusions for intentional acts and acts in violation of penal laws. This matter is before the court on Chatfield's Motion of Issuance of Order of Garnishment. She seeks garnishment against Kemper pursuant to K.S.A. 60-729 to 60-744, based upon her claim that Kemper negligently failed to settle her civil suit against Brown.
Kemper has filed no response to the Motion, which is hereby granted pursuant to D.Kan.R. 7.4. The Clerk of the Court is directed to sign and issue the Order of Garnishment (Dkt. 8-8) submitted by the defendant.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
