Gascho v. Global Fitness Holdings, LLC, 2:11-CV-436. (2018)
Court: District Court, S.D. Ohio
Number: infdco20180327a86
Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 09, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2018
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. , District Judge . On March 2, 2018, Plaintiffs' law firms and a third petitioner (VeBridge Holdings, Inc.) filed a Chapter 7 involuntary bankruptcy petition ("Involuntary Petition") pursuant to the provisions of Section 303 of Title 11 of the United States Code against Global Fitness Holdings, LLC in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. (ECF No. 305.) All of the Parties and Interested Parties before this Court agr
Summary: OPINION AND ORDER EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR. , District Judge . On March 2, 2018, Plaintiffs' law firms and a third petitioner (VeBridge Holdings, Inc.) filed a Chapter 7 involuntary bankruptcy petition ("Involuntary Petition") pursuant to the provisions of Section 303 of Title 11 of the United States Code against Global Fitness Holdings, LLC in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. (ECF No. 305.) All of the Parties and Interested Parties before this Court agre..
More
OPINION AND ORDER
EDMUND A. SARGUS, JR., District Judge.
On March 2, 2018, Plaintiffs' law firms and a third petitioner (VeBridge Holdings, Inc.) filed a Chapter 7 involuntary bankruptcy petition ("Involuntary Petition") pursuant to the provisions of Section 303 of Title 11 of the United States Code against Global Fitness Holdings, LLC in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky. (ECF No. 305.) All of the Parties and Interested Parties before this Court agree that based upon the Involuntary Petition, the automatic stay provisions of 11 U.S.C. § 362(a) have become operative. (ECF No. 306-309.) The Defendant and Interested Parties, therefore, move unopposed for all further action in this Court to be stayed (ECF No. 306, 307), which is hereby GRANTED. Accordingly, the Court STAYS all further activity in this case. The Clerk is DIRECTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE the case. The parties are DIRECTED to inform this Court forthwith if the automatic stay should be lifted.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
