U.S. v. Ridner, 6:11-CR-59-KKC-HAI-2. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky
Number: infdco20180803932
Visitors: 15
Filed: Aug. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER KAREN K. CALDWELL , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the recommended disposition of United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram concerning defendant George Ridner's reported violations of supervised release conditions. (DE 239). The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Ingram to conduct a final revocation hearing and issue a recommendation. Magistrate Judge Ingram conducted the final revocation hearing on July 26, 2018 (DE 238), and issued a recommende
Summary: ORDER KAREN K. CALDWELL , Chief District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the recommended disposition of United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram concerning defendant George Ridner's reported violations of supervised release conditions. (DE 239). The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Ingram to conduct a final revocation hearing and issue a recommendation. Magistrate Judge Ingram conducted the final revocation hearing on July 26, 2018 (DE 238), and issued a recommended..
More
ORDER
KAREN K. CALDWELL, Chief District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the recommended disposition of United States Magistrate Judge Hanly A. Ingram concerning defendant George Ridner's reported violations of supervised release conditions. (DE 239). The matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Ingram to conduct a final revocation hearing and issue a recommendation.
Magistrate Judge Ingram conducted the final revocation hearing on July 26, 2018 (DE 238), and issued a recommended disposition on July 27, 2018 (DE 239).
Ridner has waived his right to appear before a district judge and to make a statement and present information in mitigation. (DE 240-1). In his waiver, Ridner stated that if the United States objected to the recommended disposition, or if the Court determined not to adopt the recommended disposition, he would withdraw his waiver. (DE 240-1). The United States did not object to Magistrate Judge Ingram's recommended disposition.
Accordingly, and with the Court being otherwise sufficiently advised, it is hereby ORDERED that the recommended disposition (DE 239) is ADOPTED as the Court's opinion. Judgment consistent with the recommendation will be entered.
Source: Leagle
