Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Novak v. Sagamore Home Mortgage, LLC, 1:16-cv-03018-TWP-MJD. (2018)

Court: District Court, S.D. Indiana Number: infdco20180412a83 Visitors: 2
Filed: Mar. 21, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2018
Summary: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION MARK J. DINSMORE , Magistrate Judge . On February 20, 2018, the Court granted the Motion to Withdraw filed by counsel for Defendant Sagamore Home Mortgage, LLC. [ Dkt. 47. ] As a corporate entity, Sagamore Home Mortgage, LLC must be represented by counsel for this matter to proceed. Nocula v. UGS Corp., 520 F.3d 719 , 725 (7th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, the Court ordered Defendant Sagamore Home Mortgage to obtain new counsel and for such counsel to enter their app
More

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

On February 20, 2018, the Court granted the Motion to Withdraw filed by counsel for Defendant Sagamore Home Mortgage, LLC. [Dkt. 47.] As a corporate entity, Sagamore Home Mortgage, LLC must be represented by counsel for this matter to proceed. Nocula v. UGS Corp., 520 F.3d 719, 725 (7th Cir. 2008). Accordingly, the Court ordered Defendant Sagamore Home Mortgage to obtain new counsel and for such counsel to enter their appearance in this matter no later than March 19, 2018. [Dkt. 47 at 2.] If counsel did not appear by that date, the Court further ordered Defendant Sagamore Home Mortgage to show cause, by no later than March 20, 2018, why default should not be entered against it on Plaintiff's Complaint for Defendant's failure to appear to defend this action. Id.

To date, neither an appearance of new counsel nor a response to the Court's Order to Show Cause has been filed on behalf of Sagamore Home Mortgage, LLC. Consequently, the Magistrate Judge recommends the Court issue an Entry of Default against Defendant.

Any objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation shall be filed with the Clerk in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), and failure to timely file objections within fourteen days after service shall constitute a waiver of subsequent review absent a showing of good cause for such failure.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer