Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

NORTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY v. APPROXIMATELY 9117 ACRES IN PRATT, 10-1232-MLB-DWB. (2014)

Court: District Court, D. Kansas Number: infdco20140529e36 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 28, 2014
Latest Update: May 28, 2014
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge. This matter is before the court on: 1. Pratt Well Service Group's Brief (Doc. 863); 2. Huff Group's Motion to Supplement Instructions (Doc. 864); 3. Hudson Group's Motion to Supplement Instructions (Doc. 865); 4. Meireis Group and Producer Defendants' Motion to Supplement Instructions (Doc. 866); 5. Northern Natural Gas Company's Brief (Doc. 867); 6. Producer Defendants' Motion for Supplemental Instructions (Doc. 868) and Memorandum i
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

MONTI L. BELOT, District Judge.

This matter is before the court on:

1. Pratt Well Service Group's Brief (Doc. 863); 2. Huff Group's Motion to Supplement Instructions (Doc. 864); 3. Hudson Group's Motion to Supplement Instructions (Doc. 865); 4. Meireis Group and Producer Defendants' Motion to Supplement Instructions (Doc. 866); 5. Northern Natural Gas Company's Brief (Doc. 867); 6. Producer Defendants' Motion for Supplemental Instructions (Doc. 868) and Memorandum in Support (Doc. 869).

The court has reviewed the foregoing materials concerning requested supplemental instructions to the Commission. The court has also consulted with Magistrate Judge Bostwick and Commission Chair Broomes concerning the requests. After doing so the court determines that four supplemental instructions, which are being filed as a separate document, should be given to the Commission. The parties' requests for other or additional supplemental instructions are denied.

The court finds no additional instruction conference is warranted at this point, as the parties' positions have been more than adequately briefed. For purposes of the record, the court will consider the parties as having objected to and preserved for further review any failure by the court to give their requested supplemental instructions and any deviation by the court from the positions stated by the parties in their briefs.

The parties' motions for supplemental instructions (Docs. 864, 865, 866 and 868) are hereby GRANTED in PART and DENIED in PART.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer