MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S EMERGENCY MOTION TO RECONSIDER

TED STEWART, District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on Defendant's Emergency Motion to Reconsider, which the Court has construed as an objection to the Magistrate Judge's June 19, 2019 Order.

Under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and Rule 72(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court reviews a Magistrate Judge's order on nondispositive matters to determine whether it is clearly erroneous or contrary to law.1 "The clearly erroneous standard . . . requires that the reviewing court affirm unless it `on the entire evidence is left with the definite and firm conviction that a mistake has been committed.'"2 "Under the `contrary to law' standard, the district court conducts a plenary review of the magistrate judge's purely legal determinations, setting aside the magistrate judge's order only if it applied an incorrect legal standard."3

The Court has carefully reviewed Defendant's arguments and cannot conclude that the Magistrate Judge's Order is clearly erroneous or contrary to law. However, the Court agrees that Plaintiff should be required to serve its Initial Infringement Contentions before Defendant serves its Initial Non-Infringement, Unenforceability, and Invalidity Contentions, in keeping with the Court's Local Patent Rules and the Scheduling Order. It is therefore

ORDERED that Defendant's Emergency Motion to Reconsider (Docket No. 44) is GRANTED. Plaintiff is ordered to serve its Initial Infringement Contentions by August 9, 2019. Defendant is ordered to serve its Initial Non-Infringement, Unenforceability, and Invalidity Contentions by August 16, 2019. Final Infringement Contentions are due on August 23, 2019. Final Unenforceability and Invalidity Contentions are due on August 30, 2019. Final Non-Infringement Contentions are due on September 3, 2019. No further extensions will be considered or permitted.