MEMORANDUM ORDER

DANNY C. REEVES, District Judge.

Defendant/Movant Scott Sulik has filed a motion seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. [Record No. 46] Sulik claims that his attorney provided ineffective assistance. Based upon this assertion, the United States ordinarily will seek to obtain an affidavit of the movant's trial attorney in an effort to refute some or all of the defendant's claims. In this regard, the Court notes that authority from several circuits, including this circuit, would indicate that Sulik has waived his otherwise valid assertion of attorney-client privilege with respect to the specific matters raised in his § 2255 motion. See United States v. Pinson, 584 F.3d 972, 977 (10th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 559 U.S. 955 (2010); In re Lott, 424 F.3d 446, 453 (6th Cir. 2005); Bittaker v. Woodford, 331 F.3d 715, 716 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc); Johnson v. Alabama, 256 F.3d 1156, 1178 (11th Cir. 2001); Tasby v. United States, 504 F.2d 332, 336 (8th Cir. 1974); and Laughner v. United States, 373 F.2d 326, 327 (5th Cir. 1967).

Accordingly, it is hereby

ORDERED as follows:

On or before October 21, 2019, Defendant/Movant Sulik is DIRECTED to respond to the question of whether he has waived the attorney-client privilege regarding all claims of ineffective assistance of counsel concerning his motion filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. [Record No. 46]

Sulik is advised that a finding of implied waiver will result in the United States being allowed to contact his former attorney for the purpose of obtaining information necessary to respond to his claims of ineffective assistance of counsel.