Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

McCoy v. Aramark Correctional Services, 16-3027. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Kansas Number: infdco20180531a90 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 30, 2018
Latest Update: May 30, 2018
Summary: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE CARLOS MURGUIA , District Judge . On April 20, 2018, defendant Patricia Berry filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 99) and on May 7, 2018, defendant Cheryl Allen filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 103). D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d) provides that any response to a motion for judgment on the pleadings must be filed within 21 days of the motion. Any response to defendant Berry's motion was due by May 11, 2018. Any response to defendant Allen's motion
More

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

On April 20, 2018, defendant Patricia Berry filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 99) and on May 7, 2018, defendant Cheryl Allen filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (Doc. 103).

D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d) provides that any response to a motion for judgment on the pleadings must be filed within 21 days of the motion. Any response to defendant Berry's motion was due by May 11, 2018. Any response to defendant Allen's motion was due May 29, 2018. Plaintiff has filed no responses.

The court therefore orders plaintiff to show good cause in writing by June 15, 2018, why these motions should not be granted as unopposed. Should plaintiff show good cause, he must also file any response he would like the court to consider by June 15, 2018.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that plaintiff shall show good cause in writing by June 15, 2018, why defendants Berry and Allen's motions for judgment on the pleadings should not be granted as unopposed, including any response plaintiff wishes the court to consider in this matter.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer