Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Blum v. Perry, CV419-291. (2019)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20191218d64 Visitors: 27
Filed: Dec. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 17, 2019
Summary: ORDER CHRISTOPHER L. RAY , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff Jay A. Blum and his minor son, A.B., bring this suit alleging multiple causes of action related to psychiatric and behavioral modification services provided to A.B. by the various defendants. Doc. 1. As no representative had appeared on behalf of A.B, the Court ordered the plaintiffs to show cause as to why A.B. should not be dismissed from this case. Doc. 12. In response, plaintiffs have identified Dr. Sheri Stein-Blum as A.B.'s lega
More

ORDER

Plaintiff Jay A. Blum and his minor son, A.B., bring this suit alleging multiple causes of action related to psychiatric and behavioral modification services provided to A.B. by the various defendants. Doc. 1. As no representative had appeared on behalf of A.B, the Court ordered the plaintiffs to show cause as to why A.B. should not be dismissed from this case. Doc. 12. In response, plaintiffs have identified Dr. Sheri Stein-Blum as A.B.'s legal guardian and next friend. Docs. 14 & 15. However, Dr. Stein-Blum is not a suitable representative for purposes of this matter.

Federal procedures permit a "next friend" or guardian ad litem to represent and protect the interests of a minor party who lacks a duly appointed representative. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 17(c)(1). The representative, however, must be competent to provide adequate legal representation. See 43 C.J.S. INFANTS § 416, fn. 1 (2019) ("To maintain suit in federal court, a child or mental incompetent must be represented by a competent adult."). More clearly stated, the representative must be an attorney or someone possessing similar training allowing them to competently protect the interests of the minor while navigating the legal and procedural requirements of litigation. ("[I]t is not in the interests of minors or incompetents that they be represented by non-attorneys. Where they have claims that require adjudication, they are entitled to trained legal assistance so their rights may be fully protected.").

Plaintiffs have not claimed that Dr. Stein-Blum is an attorney or has any legal training. In fact, her personal website promotes her as a speech-pathologist and educator. Though these are laudable talents, they do not provide the necessary competency in law to represent the rights and interests of a minor child in a legal proceeding.

As such, the Court will AFFORD plaintiffs one more opportunity to arrange suitable representation for A.B. Within 14 days of this Order, plaintiffs shall notify the Court that counsel has been retained or file a motion requesting the appointment of counsel.1 Failure to abide by this Order will result in a recommendation that A.B. be dismissed from this case.

SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The Court may appoint counsel in civil cases; however, such appointment is a "privilege that is justified only by exceptional circumstances, such as where the facts and legal issues are so novel or complex as to require the assistance of a trained practitioner." Fowler v. Jones, 899 F.2d 1088, 1096 (11th Cir. 1990) (citing Poole v. Lambert, 819 F.2d 1025, 1028 (11th Cir. 1987), and Wahl v. McIver, 773 F.2d 1169, 1174 (11th Cir. 1985)). Any motion by plaintiffs seeking the appointment of counsel will not necessarily be granted.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer