CAMPBELL v. U.S., 11-1604. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20111017082
Visitors: 12
Filed: Oct. 17, 2011
Latest Update: Oct. 17, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Freddy S. Campbell appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. United States , No. 2:09-cv-00503 (S.D.W. Va. May 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Freddy S. Campbell appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. United States , No. 2:09-cv-00503 (S.D.W. Va. May 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the c..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Freddy S. Campbell appeals the district court's order denying his Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b) motion. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Campbell v. United States, No. 2:09-cv-00503 (S.D.W. Va. May 27, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
