Kathleen L. v. Saul, 2:18-CV-428-JVB-SLC. (2020)
Court: District Court, N.D. Indiana
Number: infdco20200129b64
Visitors: 9
Filed: Jan. 28, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 28, 2020
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on a Complaint [DE 1] filed on November 9, 2018, and on an Opening Brief [DE 19] filed on May 28, 2019. Both documents were filed by Plaintiff Kathleen L. The Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Susan Collins for a report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and Local Rule 72-1. [DE 16]. Judge Collins issued her Report and Recommendation on January 9
Summary: ORDER JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on a Complaint [DE 1] filed on November 9, 2018, and on an Opening Brief [DE 19] filed on May 28, 2019. Both documents were filed by Plaintiff Kathleen L. The Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Susan Collins for a report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and Local Rule 72-1. [DE 16]. Judge Collins issued her Report and Recommendation on January 9,..
More
ORDER
JOSEPH S. VAN BOKKELEN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on a Complaint [DE 1] filed on November 9, 2018, and on an Opening Brief [DE 19] filed on May 28, 2019. Both documents were filed by Plaintiff Kathleen L. The Court referred this case to Magistrate Judge Susan Collins for a report and recommendation under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(b), and Local Rule 72-1. [DE 16]. Judge Collins issued her Report and Recommendation on January 9, 2020. [DE 28]. The parties were given notice that they had fourteen days in which to file objections to the report and recommendation. No party has filed objections.
Judge Collins recommends that the Court (1) reverse the Commissioner's decision to deny Plaintiff disability insurance benefits, supplemental security income, and disabled widow's benefits and (2) remand this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings because the ALJ erred in determining whether Plaintiff meets a listing at step three of the five-step evaluation process.
Having reviewed the report and recommendation, the Court finds no clear error. Therefore, noting the lack of objection, the Court hereby ADOPTS in its entirety Judge Collins's Report and Recommendation [DE 28] and incorporates Judge Collins's Report and Recommendation into this Order. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the relief requested in the Opening Brief [DE 19], REVERSES the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, and REMANDS this matter for further proceedings consistent with this Order and the incorporated Report and Recommendation of Judge Collins.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle