Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Finkbeiner v. Commissioner of Social Security, 13-13906. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20190820721 Visitors: 2
Filed: Aug. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 14, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT MARIANNE O. BATTANI , District Judge . Plaintiff Kris Finkbeiner brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. The matter was remanded pursuant to Sentence Six for further proceedings, and the Court retained jurisdiction over the action. The post-remand
More

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND GRANTING MOTION FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

Plaintiff Kris Finkbeiner brought this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), challenging the final decision of the Commissioner denying Plaintiff's application for supplemental security income and disability insurance benefits. The matter was remanded pursuant to Sentence Six for further proceedings, and the Court retained jurisdiction over the action. The post-remand agency proceedings have been completed, and the results have been filed with the Court.

Therefore, on April 29, 2019, Defendants moved for entry of judgment (ECF No. 37). In a Report and Recommendation dated June 11, 2019, Magistrate Judge Mona K. Majzoub recommended the motion be granted.

Notably, after the administrative law judge conducted further proceedings, he found that Plaintiff was not disabled within the meaning the Social Security Act. (Tr. 647-80). As noted in the Report and Recommendation, Defendant incorrectly characterized the decision as fully favorable and that Plaintiff was disabled within the meaning of the Social Security Act. (See ECF No. 39 n.3). The mischarterization is immaterial to the resolution of the motion.

Because the time to file exceptions has expired, and no party has filed a response to the motion, the Court ADOPTS MAGISTRATE JUDGE MONA K. MAJZOUB'S REPORT AND RECOMMENATION AND GRANTS the motion to enter judgment.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer