Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

FIDELITY AND DEPOSIT COMPANY OF MARYLAND v. HALL, CV413-236. (2014)

Court: District Court, S.D. Georgia Number: infdco20140522937 Visitors: 5
Filed: May 21, 2014
Latest Update: May 21, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge. Before the Court is the parties' Consent Motion to Stay Case. (Doc, 21.) The parties have informed the Court that they have reached a settlement agreement that requires a stay of this action. ( Id. ) The parties have indicated they believe the settlement agreement will resolve all matters present in this action within 120 days of this order staying the case. ( Id. ) After careful consideration, the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED
More

ORDER

WILLIAM T. MOORE, Jr., District Judge.

Before the Court is the parties' Consent Motion to Stay Case. (Doc, 21.) The parties have informed the Court that they have reached a settlement agreement that requires a stay of this action. (Id.) The parties have indicated they believe the settlement agreement will resolve all matters present in this action within 120 days of this order staying the case. (Id.) After careful consideration, the motion is GRANTED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to stay this case for 120 days. Should the parties fail to settle this case in that time, the parties are DIRECTED to notify the Court of the status of this case following the conclusion of the stay.

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer