Day v. Aeroframe Services L L C, 16-1512. (2017)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20171227844
Visitors: 10
Filed: Dec. 15, 2017
Latest Update: Dec. 15, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR. , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, consideration of the objections filed, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Remand is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for attorney fees be DENIE
Summary: JUDGMENT JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR. , District Judge . For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, consideration of the objections filed, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law, IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Remand is hereby DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for attorney fees be DENIED..
More
JUDGMENT
JAMES T. TRIMBLE, JR., District Judge.
For the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge previously filed herein, after an independent review of the record, a de novo determination of the issues, consideration of the objections filed, and having determined that the findings are correct under applicable law,
IT IS ORDERED that the plaintiff's Motion to Remand is hereby DENIED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the motions for attorney fees be DENIED.
Source: Leagle
