BORDAS v. MARQUETTE TRANSPORTATION COMPANY GULF-INLAND LLC, 2:14-CV-00163. (2016)
Court: District Court, S.D. Texas
Number: infdco20160517d17
Visitors: 3
Filed: May 16, 2016
Latest Update: May 16, 2016
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION NELVA GONZALES RAMOS , District Judge . On April 26, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his "Memorandum and Recommendation" (D.E. 84), recommending the denial of motions for summary judgment due to the existence of disputed issues of material fact. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Ge
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION NELVA GONZALES RAMOS , District Judge . On April 26, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his "Memorandum and Recommendation" (D.E. 84), recommending the denial of motions for summary judgment due to the existence of disputed issues of material fact. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1); Gen..
More
ORDER ADOPTING MEMORANDUM AND RECOMMENDATION
NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, District Judge.
On April 26, 2016, United States Magistrate Judge Jason B. Libby issued his "Memorandum and Recommendation" (D.E. 84), recommending the denial of motions for summary judgment due to the existence of disputed issues of material fact. The parties were provided proper notice of, and opportunity to object to, the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation. FED. R. CIV. P. 72(b); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); General Order No. 2002-13. No objections have been filed.
When no timely objection to a magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation is filed, the district court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record and accept the magistrate judge's memorandum and recommendation. Guillory v. PPG Industries, Inc., 434 F.3d 303, 308 (5th Cir. 2005) (citing Douglass v. United Services Auto Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1420 (5th Cir. 1996)).
Having reviewed the findings of fact and conclusions of law set forth in the Magistrate Judge's Memorandum and Recommendation (D.E. 84), and all other relevant documents in the record, and finding no clear error, the Court ADOPTS as its own the findings and conclusions of the Magistrate Judge. Accordingly, the Defendants' motions for summary judgment (D.E. 64 and 65) are DENIED.
ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
