Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

BRACKMAN v. EPHESON TRANSPORT, LLC, 15-cv-325-JPG-PMF. (2015)

Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois Number: infdco20150805802 Visitors: 8
Filed: Aug. 04, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 04, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT , District Judge . This matter comes before the Court on Defendant J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.'s Motion (Doc. 13) to Dismiss Counts VII, VIII, and XII of Plaintiffs' Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs filed a timely Response (Doc. 19). Defendant J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. (hereafter "J.B. Hunt") motion to dismiss Counts VII, VIII, and XII stating that the pleadings allege that Defendant Sharew was, at all relevant t
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

This matter comes before the Court on Defendant J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc.'s Motion (Doc. 13) to Dismiss Counts VII, VIII, and XII of Plaintiffs' Complaint pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiffs filed a timely Response (Doc. 19).

Defendant J.B. Hunt Transport, Inc. (hereafter "J.B. Hunt") motion to dismiss Counts VII, VIII, and XII stating that the pleadings allege that Defendant Sharew was, at all relevant times alleged in the complaint, an agent of J.B. Hunt. J.B. Hunt attached the Outsource Carriage Agreement between J.B. Hunt and Defendant Epheson Transport, LLC as evidence that no such relationship exists.

Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(d) provides:

If, on a motion under Rule 12(b) or 12(c), matters outside the pleadings are presented to and not excluded by the court, the motion must be treated as one for summary judgment under Rule 56. All parties must be given reasonable opportunity to present all the material that is pertinent to the motion.

Defendant J.B. Hunt has motioned under Rule 12(b) and presented matters outside the pleadings. As such, the motion must be treated as a Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant J.B. Hunt is provided 14 days in which to supplement the motion solely on the issues contained in the Motion to Dismiss. The parties will be provided an opportunity for any other dispositive motion issues per the Court's scheduling order. Such supplementation, if any, is due on or before August 18th, 2015.

Plaintiffs are provided 21 days to respond to Defendant's now Motion for Summary Judgment under Rule 56. Plaintiff's response is due on or before September 8th, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer