BRADSTREET v. ROBERTSON, 13-cv-673-JPG-DGW. (2013)
Court: District Court, S.D. Illinois
Number: infdco20130904a19
Visitors: 16
Filed: Sep. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Sep. 03, 2013
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on defendant Joseph Robertson's motion to dismiss (Doc. 6). Plaintiff Ronda Bradstreet's response was due on August 22, 2013. To date the Court has not received plaintiff's response. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court may, in its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of the motion. Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court hereby ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge. This matter comes before the Court on defendant Joseph Robertson's motion to dismiss (Doc. 6). Plaintiff Ronda Bradstreet's response was due on August 22, 2013. To date the Court has not received plaintiff's response. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court may, in its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of the motion. Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court hereby ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW ..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
J. PHIL GILBERT, District Judge.
This matter comes before the Court on defendant Joseph Robertson's motion to dismiss (Doc. 6). Plaintiff Ronda Bradstreet's response was due on August 22, 2013. To date the Court has not received plaintiff's response. Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1(c), the Court may, in its discretion, construe a party's failure to file a timely response as an admission of the merits of the motion. Local Rule 7.1(c). The Court hereby ORDERS plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE on or before September 13, 2013, why the Court should not construe her failure to timely respond to the motion to dismiss as an admission of the merits of the motion.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
