EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.
This matter is currently set for a Further Case Management Conference on February 3, 2012, at 10:30 a.m. The parties submit this Joint Status Report and Updated Case Management Statement in advance of the Conference.
Since the last Status Conference before this court, the Commission has reached a resolution with defendant Emile Jilwan, and the Court has entered a Final Judgment against Jilwan pursuant to the Consent Judgment submitted by the parties.
The related criminal action against defendant Bassam Salman,
The other related criminal action charges defendants Maher Kara, Michael Kara (named as Mounir Kara in the indictment), and Emile Jilwan, in the case titled
In light of the guilty pleas of Maher Kara and Michael Kara, counsel for the Commission and these defendants are continuing to discuss potential resolution of the Commission's claims against them, but no agreed resolution has been reached at this time.
No trial date has been set for the civil action, and dates regarding discovery deadlines and pretrial dates have been previously vacated.
The parties provide the following information, updating the Case Management Statement previously submitted in this matter:
There are four defendants remaining in this civil enforcement action brought by the Commission: Maher Kara, Michael Kara, Bassam Salman, and Karim Bayyouk. All these defendants have been served and have appeared in the case.
Before discovery was stayed, the parties had begun discovery, including conducting depositions. The Commission produced documents obtained during its investigation pursuant to Rule 26 initial disclosure obligations and document requests, and the defendants have made Rule 26 initial disclosures and responded to document requests served by the Commission.
The facts of the case, the legal issues, and the relief sought by the Commission have not changed since the case was filed and the parties submitted the original Case Management Statement. The parties do not anticipate any amendments to the pleadings at this time.
The case will be tried to a jury, pursuant to jury demands made by the defendants. The parties estimate a 10-day jury trial.
Given the posture of the case, with three of the defendants in the civil case also facing criminal charges arising from the same conduct, the parties do not believe it would be productive or practical to set a trial date at this time.
In accordance with General Order 45, each of the signatories to this document have concurred in its filing, and I shall maintain records to support these concurrences.
IT IS SO ORDERED that the Further CMC is reset from 2/3/12 to 5/4/12 at 10:30 a.m. An updated joint CMC Statement is due 4/27/12.
IT IS SO ORDERED.