Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Hurd v. City of Lincoln, 4:16CV3029. (2018)

Court: District Court, D. Nebraska Number: infdco20180502j34 Visitors: 9
Filed: May 01, 2018
Latest Update: May 01, 2018
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RICHARD G. KOPF , Senior District Judge . It has come to the court's attention that there is confusion about the filing of redacted documents relating to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 107 ). On March 29 and 30, 2018, the court granted Defendants' unopposed Motions to Temporarily Restrict Filing Nos. 114 , 1 115 , 108-16 , and 108-19 for the reason that these documents contained personal data identifiers referenced in NECivR 5.3 (a) and some
More

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

It has come to the court's attention that there is confusion about the filing of redacted documents relating to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Filing No. 107). On March 29 and 30, 2018, the court granted Defendants' unopposed Motions to Temporarily Restrict Filing Nos. 114,1 115, 108-16, and 108-19 for the reason that these documents contained personal data identifiers referenced in NECivR 5.3(a) and some of the documents were protected by the parties' Stipulated Protective Order (Filing No. 25). (Filing Nos. 120, 121, 122, 124.) The court's orders provided—as agreed by both parties—that these documents shall be restricted until redacted documents are filed.

As of this date, the redacted documents have not been filed, and the abovereferenced documents are still restricted. In the interest of public access to court documents, I shall order counsel to file the redacted documents on or before May 11, 2018.

IT IS ORDERED:

1. On or before May 11, 2018, counsel shall re-file Filing Nos. 114-1, 114-2, 114-8, 114-10, 115-1, 115-2, 115-3, 115-5, 115-8, 115-15, 115-16, 108-16, and 108-19 with personal data identifiers listed in NECivR 5.3(a), Fed. R. Civ. P. 5.2(a), and material protected by the parties' Stipulated Protective Order (Filing No. 25) redacted;

2. The re-filed and redacted documents referenced in paragraph (1) of this order shall not be restricted. However, these same documents, as originally filed, shall remain restricted. The documents contained in Filing No. 114 and Filing No. 115 that are not listed in paragraph (1) of this order shall no longer be restricted.

FootNotes


1. Plaintiff's counsel has clarified that the documents to be redacted in Filing Nos. 114 and 115 are 114-1, 114-2, 114-8, 114-10, 115-1, 115-2, 115-3, 115-5, 115-8, 115-15, and 115-16.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer