Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Gonzalez v. Marshall, 97-1879 (1998)

Court: Court of Appeals for the First Circuit Number: 97-1879 Visitors: 3
Filed: Mar. 16, 1998
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: JOHN MARSHALL, ET AL.Defendants, Appellees.Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges.Mardoqueo Gonzalez on brief pro se.appellees John Marshall, Paul Verdini and Thomas Dickhaut.Pauline Sweeney.Per Curiam.
[NOT FOR PUBLICATION] UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIRST CIRCUIT No. 97-1879 MARDO Q. GONZALEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. JOHN MARSHALL, ET AL., Defendants, Appellees. APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS [Hon. Charles B. Swartwood, III, U.S. District Magistrate Judge] Before Torruella, Chief Judge, Stahl and Lynch, Circuit Judges. Mardoqueo Gonzalez on brief pro se. Nancy Ankers White, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Ann M. McCarthy, Counsel, Department of Correction, on brief for appellees John Marshall, Paul Verdini and Thomas Dickhaut. Bruce R. Henry and Morrison, Mahoney & Miller on brief for appellee Pauline Sweeney. March 12, 1998 Per Curiam. We have carefully reviewed the record in this case, including the briefs of the parties and the decisions below. Essentially for the reasons indicated by the magistrate judge in his report and recommendation, dated March 24, 1997, the grant of summary judgment to defendants/appellees is affirmed.
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer