ORDER

CAM FERENBACH, Magistrate Judge.

Before the court is Defendant's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record. (ECF No. 26). Charles M. McMahon, Esq. states that irreconcilable differences have arisen between Defendant and the law firms of McDermott Will & Emery and the Morris Law Group. Id. at 26-1, p 3.

Plaintiff does not oppose the motion. (ECF No. 27).

Discussion:

Local Rule IA 11-6 provides that "[e]xcept for good cause shown, no withdrawal or substitution will be approved if it will result in delay of discovery, the trial, or any hearing in this case." Trial date has not been set. There are no pending hearings or motions, and discovery ends July 25, 2019. (ECF No. 24).

Based on counsel's representation, the Court permits counsel to withdraw. Id. LR IA 11-6(b).

28 U.S.C. § 1654 provides that "[i]n all courts of the United States the parties may plead and conduct their own cases personally." See C.E. Pope Equity Trust v. United States, 818 F.2d 696, 697 (9th Cir. 1987). Although individuals may represent themselves pursuant to this statute, a corporation is not permitted to appear in Federal Court unless it is represented by counsel. U.S. v. High Country Broadcasting Co., Inc., 3 F.3d 1244, 1245 (9th Cir. 1993). An individual also does not have the right to appear on behalf of anyone other than himself. Pope, 818 F.2d at 697. The Ninth Circuit has permitted motions to strike and motions to dismiss pleadings filed by pro se parties on behalf of entities including trusts. Id. at 698; United States v. Nagy, C11-5066BHS, 2011 WL 3502488 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 10, 2011). Chalmers Automotive, LLC may not proceed pro se, as corporations must be represented by counsel.

The Court finds that permitting counsel to withdraw would not result in delay. LR IA 11-6. No hearing has been scheduled and trial date has not been determined.

Accordingly, and for Good Cause Shown,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that McDermott Will & Emery and the Morris Law Group's Motion to Withdraw as Counsel of Record. (ECF No. 26) is GRANTED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that JIANGSU LONGTENG-PENGDA ELECTRIC MECHANICAL CO., LTD. must retain counsel by January 11, 2019. Failure to comply with this order may result in a recommendation to the District Judge for sanctions, including case-dispositive sanctions.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Charles M. McMahon, Esq. must deliver a copy of this Order to JIANGSU LONGTENG-PENGDA ELECTRIC MECHANICAL CO., LTD. The certificate of delivery must be filed with this Court on or before December 17, 2018.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Mr. McMahon must file with the Court the identity of one or more officers, directors, or managing agent of JIANGSU LONGTENG-PENGDA ELECTRIC MECHANICAL CO., LTD. known to him, and the last known address(es) and contact information of JIANGSU LONGTENG-PENGDA ELECTRIC MECHANICAL CO., LTD., on or before December 17, 2018.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a status hearing is scheduled for 10:00 AM, January 18, 2019, in Courtroom 3D.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that an officer, director, or managing agent of JIANGSU LONGTENG-PENGDA ELECTRIC MECHANICAL CO., LTD. JIANGSU LONGTENG-PENGDA ELECTRIC MECHANICAL CO., LTD. must attend the status hearing on 10:00 AM, January 18, 2019, in Courtroom 3D.