Drury v. Bernhardt, 1:16-CV-00530-LEW. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20190117h70
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jan. 16, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 16, 2019
Summary: ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S DISCOVERY ORDER LANCE E. WALKER , District Judge . On December 6, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge entered his Order on Discovery Issue. Plaintiff filed an appeal of the Magistrate Judge's ruling on December 20, 2018. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Order. I concur with the Magistrate Judge's Order because it is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, and I determine that no further procee
Summary: ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S DISCOVERY ORDER LANCE E. WALKER , District Judge . On December 6, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge entered his Order on Discovery Issue. Plaintiff filed an appeal of the Magistrate Judge's ruling on December 20, 2018. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Order. I concur with the Magistrate Judge's Order because it is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, and I determine that no further proceed..
More
ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF'S OBJECTION TO THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S DISCOVERY ORDER
LANCE E. WALKER, District Judge.
On December 6, 2018, the United States Magistrate Judge entered his Order on Discovery Issue. Plaintiff filed an appeal of the Magistrate Judge's ruling on December 20, 2018. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Order.
I concur with the Magistrate Judge's Order because it is neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law, and I determine that no further proceeding is necessary. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a). The objection is overruled and the Magistrate Judge's Order is affirmed.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
