Soto v. Seymour, 2:19-cv-00269-JDL. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20191106c98
Visitors: 17
Filed: Nov. 05, 2019
Latest Update: Nov. 05, 2019
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JON D. LEVY , Chief District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 15) with the Court on September 20, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), regarding Defendant Kevin Joyce's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) and Defendant Keith Seymour's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 14). The time within which to file objections
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JON D. LEVY , Chief District Judge . United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 15) with the Court on September 20, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), regarding Defendant Kevin Joyce's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) and Defendant Keith Seymour's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 14). The time within which to file objections ..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JON D. LEVY, Chief District Judge.
United States Magistrate Judge John C. Nivison filed his Recommended Decision (ECF No. 15) with the Court on September 20, 2019, pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 636(b)(1)(B) (West 2019) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), regarding Defendant Kevin Joyce's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) and Defendant Keith Seymour's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 14). The time within which to file objections has expired, and no objections have been filed. The Magistrate Judge provided notice that a party's failure to object would waive the right to de novo review and appeal.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record, and I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision. I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision (ECF No. 15) of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ACCEPTED and Defendant Joyce's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 12) and Defendant Seymour's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings (ECF No. 14) are GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
