Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

HOLLINGSWORTH v. DALY, 2015. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. Kentucky Number: infdco20160927d42 Visitors: 10
Filed: Sep. 26, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 26, 2016
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM O. BERTELSMAN , District Judge . This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Disposition (Doc. 98), and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by plaintiff (Doc. 99), defendants' response (Doc. 100) and plaintiff's reply (Doc. 101) and the Court being advised, IT IS ORDERED that the objections to the Recommended Disposition of the Magistrate Judge be, and they are, overruled; that the Recommended Disposition (Doc. 98) be, and it
More

ORDER

This matter is before the Court on the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Disposition (Doc. 98), and having considered de novo those objections filed thereto by plaintiff (Doc. 99), defendants' response (Doc. 100) and plaintiff's reply (Doc. 101) and the Court being advised,

IT IS ORDERED that the objections to the Recommended Disposition of the Magistrate Judge be, and they are, overruled; that the Recommended Disposition (Doc. 98) be, and it hereby is, adopted as the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this Court; and that defendants' motions for summary judgment (Docs. 79 and 80) be, and hereby are, granted; that plaintiff's dispositive motions (Doc. 76 and 78) and plaintiff's cross-motion for summary judgment (Doc. 82) be, and hereby are, denied. A separate Judgment shall enter concurrently herewith.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer