Milo (ID 0101994) v. Schnurr, 17-3154-SAC. (2017)
Court: District Court, D. Kansas
Number: infdco20171129b14
Visitors: 9
Filed: Nov. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 28, 2017
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SAM A. CROW , Senior District Judge . This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254. On October 24, 2017, the Court ordered a response to the petition. Petitioner has filed a motion of tort (Doc. #16) in which he seeks damages. Although damages are not available in habeas corpus, a state prisoner may seek such relief in an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Here, however, petitioner's request for damages in barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S.
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER SAM A. CROW , Senior District Judge . This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. 2254. On October 24, 2017, the Court ordered a response to the petition. Petitioner has filed a motion of tort (Doc. #16) in which he seeks damages. Although damages are not available in habeas corpus, a state prisoner may seek such relief in an action under 42 U.S.C. 1983. Here, however, petitioner's request for damages in barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 4..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SAM A. CROW, Senior District Judge.
This matter is a petition for habeas corpus filed under 28 U.S.C. §2254. On October 24, 2017, the Court ordered a response to the petition.
Petitioner has filed a motion of tort (Doc. #16) in which he seeks damages. Although damages are not available in habeas corpus, a state prisoner may seek such relief in an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Here, however, petitioner's request for damages in barred by Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477 (1994). In Heck v. Humphrey, the U.S. Supreme Court held that when a state prisoner seeks damages in a claim related to his conviction or sentence, the district court must consider whether a judgment in favor of the prisoner would necessarily imply the invalidity of the conviction or sentence. If so, the complaint must be dismissed. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. at 487. Because petitioner has not yet obtained relief from his conviction or sentence, his claim for damages is premature.
IT IS, THEREFORE, BY THE COURT ORDERED petitioner's motion of tort is liberally construed as a motion for damages and is denied.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
