James v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, 19-2543-KHV. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Kansas
Number: infdco20191030g46
Visitors: 17
Filed: Oct. 25, 2019
Latest Update: Oct. 25, 2019
Summary: ORDER JAMES P. O'HARA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) (ECF No. 16). Under the time requirements set forth in D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d), defendants' response to the motion was due on October 21, 2019. No timely opposition has been filed. D. Kan. Rule 7.4 provides, "If a responsive brief or memorandum is not filed within the D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d) time requirements, the court will consider and decide the
Summary: ORDER JAMES P. O'HARA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) (ECF No. 16). Under the time requirements set forth in D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d), defendants' response to the motion was due on October 21, 2019. No timely opposition has been filed. D. Kan. Rule 7.4 provides, "If a responsive brief or memorandum is not filed within the D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d) time requirements, the court will consider and decide the ..
More
ORDER
JAMES P. O'HARA, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff has filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 15(a) (ECF No. 16). Under the time requirements set forth in D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d), defendants' response to the motion was due on October 21, 2019. No timely opposition has been filed.
D. Kan. Rule 7.4 provides, "If a responsive brief or memorandum is not filed within the D. Kan. Rule 6.1(d) time requirements, the court will consider and decide the motion as an uncontested motion. Ordinarily the court will grant the motion without further notice." The court considers the instant motion unopposed. In addition, the court finds good cause for the proposed amendments. The motion is granted. Plaintiff shall file his second amended complaint forthwith.
Source: Leagle
