Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. COLLINS, 2:14-CR-18-DBH. (2017)

Court: District Court, D. Maine Number: infdco20171003c00 Visitors: 7
Filed: Oct. 02, 2017
Latest Update: Oct. 02, 2017
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE D. BROCK HORNBY , District Judge . On September 12, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. 2255 Motion. The time within which to file objections expired on September 26, 2017, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal. It is there
More

ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On September 12, 2017, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with copies to the parties, his Recommended Decision on 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion. The time within which to file objections expired on September 26, 2017, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the parties that failure to object would waive their right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. An evidentiary hearing is not warranted under Rule 8 of the Rules Governing Section 2255 Cases. The petition for habeas relief is DENIED. No certificate of appealability shall issue because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer