Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

U.S. v. Alexander, CCB-05-0407. (2019)

Court: District Court, D. Maryland Number: infdco20190618852 Visitors: 7
Filed: Jun. 14, 2019
Latest Update: Jun. 14, 2019
Summary: MEMORANDUM CATHERINE C. BLAKE , District Judge . The motion for relief filed on behalf of Kendall Alexander, Sr. (ECF No. 105) has been reviewed, together with the government's motion to hold case in abeyance (ECF No. 107). 1 A conference call was held on June 12, 2019. Mr. Alexander, whose release date would be approximately May 2, 2019, if his good-conduct time was recalculated immediately, understandably seeks to avoid any delay. As many other courts have concluded, however, it appear
More

MEMORANDUM

The motion for relief filed on behalf of Kendall Alexander, Sr. (ECF No. 105) has been reviewed, together with the government's motion to hold case in abeyance (ECF No. 107).1 A conference call was held on June 12, 2019.

Mr. Alexander, whose release date would be approximately May 2, 2019, if his good-conduct time was recalculated immediately, understandably seeks to avoid any delay. As many other courts have concluded, however, it appears that the plain language of the First Step Act of 2018 extends the Bureau of Prisons' time to recalculate inmates' sentences until the "risk and needs assessment" is completed, and the Attorney General was given 210 days to complete that task. First Step Act of 2018, Pub. L. No. 115-391, December 21, 2018, 132 Stat. 5194, § 102(b)(1); United States v. Daniels, 2019 WL 2354388, at *4 (D. Conn. June 4, 2019); Villafane v. White, 2019 WL 2343075, at *1 (M.D. Pa. June 3, 2019); Musgrove v. Ortiz, 2019 WL 2240563, at *2-3 (D.N.J. May 24, 2019); United States v. Murgia, 2019 WL 2236067, at *2-3 (D. Alaska May 22, 2019); United States v. Yates, 2019 WL 1779773, at *3 (D. Kan. Apr. 23, 2019); Brown v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg, 2019 WL 1780747, at *6 (D.S.C. Mar. 25, 2019), report and recommendation adopted, 2019 WL 1773382 (D.S.C. Apr. 23, 2019). Accordingly, Mr. Alexander's sentence should be recalculated as of (approximately) July 19, 2019, which will become his release date.

Regarding the second aspect of the motion for relief, the court declines to make a recommendation to the Parole Commission to withdraw the violation warrant, but presumes that the Commission will take into account all relevant information, including Mr. Alexander's conduct during his incarceration.

A separate Order follows.

FootNotes


1. The court thanks the Federal Public Defender for accepting appointment in this case.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer