U.S. v. BROWN, JKB-10-0498. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Maryland
Number: infdco20150624b90
Visitors: 29
Filed: Jun. 23, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 23, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES K. BREDAR , District Judge . Now pending before the Court is the Defendant's MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF SENTENCE (ECF No. 198). The motion is DENIED. The Court is unaware of authority granting it to jurisdiction to consider this motion in what is an otherwise closed case. The circumstances described by the Defendant do not qualify the case for consideration under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Finally, the Court is aware of no authority granting
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JAMES K. BREDAR , District Judge . Now pending before the Court is the Defendant's MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF SENTENCE (ECF No. 198). The motion is DENIED. The Court is unaware of authority granting it to jurisdiction to consider this motion in what is an otherwise closed case. The circumstances described by the Defendant do not qualify the case for consideration under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Finally, the Court is aware of no authority granting ..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JAMES K. BREDAR, District Judge.
Now pending before the Court is the Defendant's MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF SENTENCE (ECF No. 198). The motion is DENIED. The Court is unaware of authority granting it to jurisdiction to consider this motion in what is an otherwise closed case. The circumstances described by the Defendant do not qualify the case for consideration under Rule 35, Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. Finally, the Court is aware of no authority granting a Defendant credit against their sentence for that time spent on release prior to conviction, even if that release was subject to conditions such as the posting of a bond, electronic monitoring, telephone supervision, general supervision by a pretrial services officer, or any other condition short of detention.
Source: Leagle
