WHITLOCK v. LAZOR SPOT, INC., 15-01814. (2016)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20160201780
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 19, 2016
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2016
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling and for those additional reasons in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which has been adopted by the Court after a de novo review of the record, including objections to the Report and Recommendation and the response to the objections, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Bobby
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling and for those additional reasons in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which has been adopted by the Court after a de novo review of the record, including objections to the Report and Recommendation and the response to the objections, IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Bobby ..
More
JUDGMENT
ROBERT G. JAMES, District Judge.
For the reasons set forth in this Court's Ruling and for those additional reasons in the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, which has been adopted by the Court after a de novo review of the record, including objections to the Report and Recommendation and the response to the objections,
IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that Defendant Lazer Spot, Inc.'s Motion to Dismiss under F.R.C.P. 12(b)(6) is GRANTED, and Plaintiff Bobby D. Whitlock's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
Source: Leagle
