Howard v Sams East Inc, 17-0916. (2017)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20171201b35
Visitors: 18
Filed: Nov. 30, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 30, 2017
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sam's East, Inc.'s Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 7] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART . To the extent that Defendant moves for dismissal of Plaintiff's claims for harassment/hostile work environ
Summary: JUDGMENT ROBERT G. JAMES , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sam's East, Inc.'s Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 7] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART . To the extent that Defendant moves for dismissal of Plaintiff's claims for harassment/hostile work environm..
More
JUDGMENT
ROBERT G. JAMES, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendant Sam's East, Inc.'s Rule 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss [Doc. No. 7] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Defendant moves for dismissal of Plaintiff's claims for harassment/hostile work environment and retaliation under Title VII, together with her claims for harassment/hostile work environment under 42 U.S.C. § 1981, the motion is GRANTED, and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The motion (including the motion to dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction) is otherwise DENIED.
Source: Leagle