Advocacy Center v. Louisiana Tech University, 18-0934. (2019)
Court: District Court, W.D. Louisiana
Number: infdco20190322c11
Visitors: 8
Filed: Mar. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Mar. 21, 2019
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 13] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the
Summary: JUDGMENT TERRY A. DOUGHTY , District Judge . The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter, IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 13] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the m..
More
JUDGMENT
TERRY A. DOUGHTY, District Judge.
The Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge having been considered, no objections thereto having been filed, and finding that same is supported by the law and the record in this matter,
IT IS ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss First Amended Complaint [Doc. No. 13] is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART. To the extent that Defendants move to dismiss Plaintiff's First Amended Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, the motion is GRANTED, and Plaintiff's lawsuit is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE in its entirety. The motion is otherwise DENIED AS MOOT.
Source: Leagle
