Turner v. U.S., 1:15-cr-00040-JAW (2018)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20181109k17
Visitors: 4
Filed: Nov. 08, 2018
Latest Update: Nov. 08, 2018
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. , District Judge . No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed September 6, 2018 (ECF No. 743), the Recommended Decision is accepted. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concu
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR. , District Judge . No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed September 6, 2018 (ECF No. 743), the Recommended Decision is accepted. I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JOHN A. WOODCOCK, JR., District Judge.
No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed September 6, 2018 (ECF No. 743), the Recommended Decision is accepted.
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) (ECF No. 735) be and hereby is DENIED. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
