Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

ALLEN v. U.S., 1:03-cr-00058-JAW. (2016)

Court: District Court, D. Maine Number: infdco20160914g66 Visitors: 5
Filed: Sep. 13, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 13, 2016
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOHN A. WOODCOCK, Jr. , District Judge . No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed June 28, 2016 (ECF No. 95), the Recommended Decision is accepted. Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petitioner's Motion to Amend (ECF No. 91) be and hereby is DISMISSED as moot. It is further ORDERED that the prior Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 93) is hereby MOOTED. It
More

ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

No objection having been filed to the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision filed June 28, 2016 (ECF No. 95), the Recommended Decision is accepted.

Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the Petitioner's Motion to Amend (ECF No. 91) be and hereby is DISMISSED as moot. It is further

ORDERED that the prior Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 93) is hereby MOOTED. It is further ORDERED that the Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence (2255) (ECF No. 75) be and hereby is DIMISSED. It is further ORDERED that no certificate of appealability should issue in the event the Petitioner files a notice of appeal because there is no substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).

SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer