HICA EDUCATION LOAN CORPORATION v. WEBSTER, 2:11-cv-00146-NT. (2012)
Court: District Court, D. Maine
Number: infdco20120531a49
Visitors: 17
Filed: May 29, 2012
Latest Update: May 29, 2012
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION TO STRIKE NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge. On February 27, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court his Report and Recommended Decision on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment and Memorandum Decision on Motion to Strike (Docket No. 24). The Defendant filed her objections on March 15, 2012 (Docket No. 26). The Plaintiff filed its response to the Defendant's objectio
Summary: ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION TO STRIKE NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge. On February 27, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court his Report and Recommended Decision on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment and Memorandum Decision on Motion to Strike (Docket No. 24). The Defendant filed her objections on March 15, 2012 (Docket No. 26). The Plaintiff filed its response to the Defendant's objection..
More
ORDER AFFIRMING THE RECOMMENDED DECISION ON CROSS-MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND MEMORANDUM DECISION ON MOTION TO STRIKE
NANCY TORRESEN, District Judge.
On February 27, 2012, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court his Report and Recommended Decision on Cross Motions for Summary Judgment and Memorandum Decision on Motion to Strike (Docket No. 24). The Defendant filed her objections on March 15, 2012 (Docket No. 26). The Plaintiff filed its response to the Defendant's objections on April 2, 2012 (Docket No. 27).
I have reviewed and considered the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision, together with the entire record; I have made a de novo determination of all matters adjudicated by the Magistrate Judge's Recommended Decision; and I concur with the recommendations of the United States Magistrate Judge for the reasons set forth in his Recommended Decision, and determine that no further proceeding is necessary.
It is therefore ORDERED that:
1. The Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby AFFIRMED;
2. The Defendant's Motion to Strike is DENIED;
3. The Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED and the Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED.
SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
