U.S. v. WILLIAMS, 10-6795. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110103056
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jan. 03, 2011
Latest Update: Jan. 03, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Namond Earl Williams appeals the district court's orders denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would no
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Namond Earl Williams appeals the district court's orders denying his 18 U.S.C. 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Namond Earl Williams appeals the district court's orders denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for a sentence reduction and denying reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's orders. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
