ROBINSON v. EQUIFAX, 11-1125. (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110427143
Visitors: 18
Filed: Apr. 27, 2011
Latest Update: Apr. 27, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rene Robinson appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint against Equifax, Experian, and Transunion, for allegedly violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681-1681(u) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Experian , No. 4:10-cv-00084-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2011). We dispense with
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Rene Robinson appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint against Equifax, Experian, and Transunion, for allegedly violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. 1681-1681(u) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Experian , No. 4:10-cv-00084-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2011). We dispense with o..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
Rene Robinson appeals the district court's order dismissing her complaint against Equifax, Experian, and Transunion, for allegedly violating the Fair Credit Reporting Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 1681-1681(u) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Robinson v. Experian, No. 4:10-cv-00084-BO (E.D.N.C. Jan. 26, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle
