Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

BROADBENT WILDLIFE SANCTUARY, INC. v. BUDDY GREGG MOTOR HOMES, LLC, 3:14-CV-109-TAV-HBG. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. Tennessee Number: infdco20150721c42 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jul. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER THOMAS A. VARLAN , Chief District Judge . This civil matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on June 29, 2015 [Doc. 57]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Guyton recommends that the Court enter an order granting in part and denying in part Newmar Corporation's Motion to Stay, Transfer or Consolidate [Doc. 41] and transferring this action to the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, to al
More

ORDER

This civil matter is before the Court on the Report and Recommendation (the "R&R") entered by United States Magistrate Judge H. Bruce Guyton on June 29, 2015 [Doc. 57]. In the R&R, Magistrate Judge Guyton recommends that the Court enter an order granting in part and denying in part Newmar Corporation's Motion to Stay, Transfer or Consolidate [Doc. 41] and transferring this action to the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, to allow it to be consolidated with Broadbent Wildlife Sanctuary, Inc. v. Newmar Corporation, et al., No. 3:14-cv-542, as that court deems appropriate. There have been no timely objections to the R&R, and enough time has passed since the filing of the R&R to treat any objections as having been waived. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).

After a careful review of the matter, the Court is in agreement with Magistrate Judge Guyton's recommendations, which the Court adopts and incorporates into its ruling. Accordingly, the Court ACCEPTS IN WHOLE the R&R [Doc. 57]. Therefore, the Motion to Stay, Transfer or Consolidate [Doc. 41] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part, and the Clerk is hereby DIRECTED to TRANSFER this action to the Northern District of Indiana, South Bend Division, to allow it to be consolidated with Broadbent Wildlife Sanctuary, Inc. v. Newmar Corporation, et al., No. 3:14-cv-542, as that court deems appropriate.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer