Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Mossy of Mississippi, LLC v. Automotive Alternative, LLC, 1:16-cv-135-HSO-JCG. (2016)

Court: District Court, S.D. Mississippi Number: infdco20160721b06 Visitors: 21
Filed: Jul. 20, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 20, 2016
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [15] HALIL SULEYMAN OZERDEN , District Judge . BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiffs Mossy of Mississippi, LLC and Nissan of Picayune, LLC's, Motion for Default Judgment [15] pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2). 1 The record reflects that Defendants, Automotive Alternative, LLC and Pete Garrett have made no appearance and have filed no answer to Plaintiffs' Original Complaint. On Jun 9, 2016, Pla
More

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT [15]

BEFORE THE COURT is Plaintiffs Mossy of Mississippi, LLC and Nissan of Picayune, LLC's, Motion for Default Judgment [15] pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(b)(2).1

The record reflects that Defendants, Automotive Alternative, LLC and Pete Garrett have made no appearance and have filed no answer to Plaintiffs' Original Complaint. On Jun 9, 2016, Plaintiffs, Mossy of Mississippi, LLC and Nissan of Picayune, obtained a Clerk's Entry of Default [14] against Defendants, Automotive Alternative, LLC and Pete Garrett.

The record reflects that Defendants Automotive Alternative, LLC and Pete Garrett owe to Plaintiffs, Mossy of Mississippi, LLC and Nissan of Picayune, LLC the following monies:

Mossy of Mississippi, LLC $ 28,800.00 Nissan of Picayune, LLC $ 99,850.00 Attorney's Fees $ 3,330.00 Costs $ 880.82 ___________ Total $132,860.82

After due consideration of the Motion for Default Judgment, the affidavit submitted, the record, and relevant legal authority, the Court finds that Plaintiffs' Motion is well taken and should be granted as to Plaintiffs' request for damages, attorney's fees and costs. Plaintiffs' request for post-judgment interest at the rate of 18% is not well taken and will be denied, and the post-judgment interest rate will be set pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. "Federal law governs post-judgment interest in federal cases, including diversity cases." Tricon Energy Ltd. v. Vinmar Int'l, Ltd., 718 F.3d 448, 458-59 (5th Cir. 2013) ("Parties wishing to contract around the statutory rate must do so using clear, unambiguous, and unequivocal language, otherwise, the contract merely merges into the judgment.") (internal citations and quotations omitted)).

For the foregoing reasons, the Court will grant in part Plaintiffs' Motion for Default Judgment [15] and will enter a Default Judgment against Defendants Automotive Alternative, LLC and Pete Garrett, in the total amount of $132,860.82, inclusive of attorney's fees and costs. The Court will deny in part Plaintiffs' Motion as to the post-judgment rate of interest at 18%, and instead will grant to Plaintiffs post-judgment interest pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961.

IT IS, THEREFORE, ORDERED AND ADJUDGED, that Plaintiffs' Motion [15] for Default Judgment is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART. The Court will enter a separate Default Judgment against Defendants Automotive Alternative, LLC and Pete Garrett.

FootNotes


1. Plaintiffs cited to to FED. R. CIV. P. 55(b)(1); however, the Motion is before the Court pursuant to FED. R. CIV. P. 55(b)(2).
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer