Filed: Jun. 04, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2018
Summary: ORDER EDWARD G. SMITH , District Judge . AND NOW , this 4th day of June, 2018, after considering the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant (Doc. No. 64), the response in opposition filed by the relator (Doc. No. 69), the defendant's reply to the response in opposition (Doc. No. 70), the relator's supplemental brief (Doc. No. 75), the defendant's supplemental brief (Doc. No. 76), the record presented to the court by the parties, the arguments presented to the court at oral argu
Summary: ORDER EDWARD G. SMITH , District Judge . AND NOW , this 4th day of June, 2018, after considering the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant (Doc. No. 64), the response in opposition filed by the relator (Doc. No. 69), the defendant's reply to the response in opposition (Doc. No. 70), the relator's supplemental brief (Doc. No. 75), the defendant's supplemental brief (Doc. No. 76), the record presented to the court by the parties, the arguments presented to the court at oral argum..
More
ORDER
EDWARD G. SMITH, District Judge.
AND NOW, this 4th day of June, 2018, after considering the motion for summary judgment filed by the defendant (Doc. No. 64), the response in opposition filed by the relator (Doc. No. 69), the defendant's reply to the response in opposition (Doc. No. 70), the relator's supplemental brief (Doc. No. 75), the defendant's supplemental brief (Doc. No. 76), the record presented to the court by the parties, the arguments presented to the court at oral argument; and for the reasons set forth in the separately filed memorandum opinion; accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that the motion for summary judgment (Doc. No. 64) is DENIED.
