HORN v. MOUNTAIN ENTERPRISES, INC., 90 So.3d 385 (2012)
Court: Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Number: inkyco20120525295
Visitors: 8
Filed: May 25, 2012
Latest Update: May 25, 2012
Summary: ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM. * The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent commingled personal funds with client funds in his trust account and issued checks from the account for personal expenses. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition, IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and tha
Summary: ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS PER CURIAM. * The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent commingled personal funds with client funds in his trust account and issued checks from the account for personal expenses. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition, IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that..
More
ATTORNEY DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS
PER CURIAM.*
The Office of Disciplinary Counsel ("ODC") commenced an investigation into allegations that respondent commingled personal funds with client funds in his trust account and issued checks from the account for personal expenses. Prior to the institution of formal charges, respondent and the ODC submitted a joint petition for consent discipline. Having reviewed the petition,
IT IS ORDERED that the Petition for Consent Discipline be accepted and that Mack H. McCraney, Louisiana Bar Roll number 9171, be suspended from the practice of law for a period of six months. This suspension shall be deferred in its entirety, subject to respondent's successful completion of a two-year period of supervised probation governed by the terms and conditions set forth in the Petition for Consent Discipline. The probationary period shall commence from the date respondent, the probation monitor, and the ODC execute a formal probation plan. Any failure of respondent to comply with the conditions of probation, or any misconduct during the probationary period, may be grounds for making the deferred suspension executory, or imposing additional discipline, as appropriate.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all costs and expenses in the matter are assessed against respondent in accordance with Supreme Court Rule XIX, § 10.1, with legal interest to commence thirty days from the date of finality of this court's judgment until paid.
FootNotes
* Chief Justice Kimball not participating in the opinion.
Source: Leagle