CORAL CHEMICAL COMPANY v. GALAXY ASSOCIATES, INC., 14-MC-029. (2014)
Court: District Court, E.D. Wisconsin
Number: infdco20140626e32
Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 25, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 25, 2014
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, Chief District Judge. Movant Matthew Roeser filed this Motion to Quash Subpoena on May 13, 2014. The subpoena relates to litigation in the District of Minnesota to which Roeser is not a party. The Court held a telephone hearing regarding the motion on May 23, 2014, attended by counsel for Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Movant. During the hearing, the Court directed Plaintiffs to submit a response to the motion on or before June 17, 2014. To date, the Court has not rec
Summary: ORDER WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, Chief District Judge. Movant Matthew Roeser filed this Motion to Quash Subpoena on May 13, 2014. The subpoena relates to litigation in the District of Minnesota to which Roeser is not a party. The Court held a telephone hearing regarding the motion on May 23, 2014, attended by counsel for Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Movant. During the hearing, the Court directed Plaintiffs to submit a response to the motion on or before June 17, 2014. To date, the Court has not rece..
More
ORDER
WILLIAM C. GRIESBACH, Chief District Judge.
Movant Matthew Roeser filed this Motion to Quash Subpoena on May 13, 2014. The subpoena relates to litigation in the District of Minnesota to which Roeser is not a party. The Court held a telephone hearing regarding the motion on May 23, 2014, attended by counsel for Plaintiffs, Defendants, and Movant. During the hearing, the Court directed Plaintiffs to submit a response to the motion on or before June 17, 2014.
To date, the Court has not received Plaintiffs' response. Because Plaintiffs have failed to respond as directed, the Court will assume that they no longer oppose the motion. Based on the current record, I conclude that the subpoena creates an undue burden and requests information not reasonably calculated to lead to the discovery of admissible evidence. Accordingly, the motion to quash the subpoena of Matthew Roeser is GRANTED and the subpoena is quashed.
Source: Leagle
