U.S. v. VARGAS, 14-cr-30010-MGM. (2015)
Court: District Court, D. Massachusetts
Number: infdco20150618919
Visitors: 20
Filed: Jun. 17, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 17, 2015
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. Nos. 88, 92) MARK G. MASTROIANNI , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson has recommended the court deny Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment against him due to the Government's alleged discovery violations. (Dkt. No. 88; Dkt. No. 92.) No objections have been filed. Based upon the thorough analysis presented in the Report and Recommendation, and noting there are no obj
Summary: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. Nos. 88, 92) MARK G. MASTROIANNI , District Judge . Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson has recommended the court deny Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment against him due to the Government's alleged discovery violations. (Dkt. No. 88; Dkt. No. 92.) No objections have been filed. Based upon the thorough analysis presented in the Report and Recommendation, and noting there are no obje..
More
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER RE: REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION REGARDING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS (Dkt. Nos. 88, 92)
MARK G. MASTROIANNI, District Judge.
Magistrate Judge Katherine A. Robertson has recommended the court deny Defendant's motion to dismiss the indictment against him due to the Government's alleged discovery violations. (Dkt. No. 88; Dkt. No. 92.) No objections have been filed.
Based upon the thorough analysis presented in the Report and Recommendation, and noting there are no objections, the court, upon de novo review, hereby ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. (Dkt. No. 92.) Based upon this, the Motion to Dismiss is DENIED.
It is So Ordered.
Source: Leagle
