MARK L. HORNSBY, Magistrate Judge.
Lida Mosley Green ("Plaintiff") filed this civil action against defendants based on allegations of fraud, conversion, and other related claims. Plaintiff invoked the court's diversity jurisdiction, which puts the burden on Plaintiff to allege complete diversity of citizenship of the parties and an amount in controversy over $75,000.
The complaint states that Plaintiff is domiciled in Louisiana. Plaintiff alleges that the amount in controversy, including attorneys' fees, treble damages for fraud and LUPTA violations, and special damages, is greater than $75,000. In Plaintiff's listing of the parties, she states that defendants Patricia Mosley White and Abel Mosley are residents of Texas. Ordinarily, an allegation of residency would not be sufficient to allege a party's citizenship. However, in the "Jurisdiction" section of her complaint, Plaintiff states that the defendants are domiciled in Texas. Accordingly, the complaint is adequate with regard to these allegations
The complaint states that defendant Charley & Ether Mosley Corporation is a Texas corporation. A corporation is deemed to be a citizen of (1) the state in which it was incorporated and (2) the state where it has its principal place of business. 28 U.S.C. § 1332(c)(1). To establish diversity jurisdiction, a complaint or notice of removal must set forth "with specificity" a corporate party's state of incorporation and its principal place of business. "Where the plaintiff [or removing party] fails to state the place of incorporation or the principal place of business of a corporate party, the pleadings are inadequate to establish diversity."
The need to establish citizenship with specificity at an early stage of the case was recently emphasized in