THOMAS v. AJALA, 11-6298 (2011)
Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Number: infco20110829114
Visitors: 32
Filed: Aug. 29, 2011
Latest Update: Aug. 29, 2011
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Titus Thomas challenges the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) civil rights complaints. We have reviewed the record and conclude that there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Ajala , No. 8:10-cv-02090-AW (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2011); Thomas v. Wilson , No. 8:10-cv-02003-AW (D. Md. Jan.
Summary: Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: In these consolidated appeals, Titus Thomas challenges the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. 1983 (2006) civil rights complaints. We have reviewed the record and conclude that there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Ajala , No. 8:10-cv-02090-AW (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2011); Thomas v. Wilson , No. 8:10-cv-02003-AW (D. Md. Jan. 2..
More
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
PER CURIAM:
In these consolidated appeals, Titus Thomas challenges the district court's orders denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) civil rights complaints. We have reviewed the record and conclude that there is no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Thomas v. Ajala, No. 8:10-cv-02090-AW (D. Md. Feb. 23, 2011); Thomas v. Wilson, No. 8:10-cv-02003-AW (D. Md. Jan. 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED.
Source: Leagle