Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

VEDROS v. NORTHROP GRUMMAN SHIPBUILDING, INC., 11-1198 (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania Number: infdco20120806831 Visitors: 4
Filed: Aug. 02, 2012
Latest Update: Aug. 02, 2012
Summary: ORDER EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, Judge. AND NOW , this 1st day of August, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Set a Hearing for the Second Motion to Remand (ECF No. 11) and re-filed Second Motion to Remand and Motion to Strike Affidavits (ECF No. 22) are DENIED. It is further ORDERED that the following motions 1 shall be TERMINATED as moot: (1) Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Reply (ECF No. 29) (2) Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Opposition to Plaintiffs' Impro
More

ORDER

EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, Judge.

AND NOW, this 1st day of August, 2012, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiffs' Motion to Set a Hearing for the Second Motion to Remand (ECF No. 11) and re-filed Second Motion to Remand and Motion to Strike Affidavits (ECF No. 22) are DENIED.

It is further ORDERED that the following motions1 shall be TERMINATED as moot:

(1) Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Reply (ECF No. 29) (2) Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Opposition to Plaintiffs' Improper Motion to Strike (ECF No. 28) (3) Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Motion to Remand & Motion to Strike (ECF No. 30) (4) Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Memorandum (ECF No. 36) (5) Defendants' Motion for Leave to File Reply (ECF No. 46).

AND IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. The substance of these motions were considered in the disposition of Plaintiffs' Second Motion to Remand.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer