Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Synergen Inc. v. FCA US LLC, 16-cv-11842. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. Michigan Number: infdco20180314c53 Visitors: 17
Filed: Mar. 13, 2018
Latest Update: Mar. 13, 2018
Summary: ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ENFORCE COURT ORDER (ECF #89) MATTHEW F. LEITMAN , District Judge . On November 3, 2017, Defendant FCA US, LLC filed a motion to enforce a May 12, 2017, order that the Court entered resolving a discovery dispute between the parties. ( See ECF #89.) The Court held a hearing on FCA's motion on March 13, 2018. For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that FCA's motion is GRANTED IN PART AND
More

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO ENFORCE COURT ORDER (ECF #89)

On November 3, 2017, Defendant FCA US, LLC filed a motion to enforce a May 12, 2017, order that the Court entered resolving a discovery dispute between the parties. (See ECF #89.) The Court held a hearing on FCA's motion on March 13, 2018.

For the reasons stated on the record at the hearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that FCA's motion is GRANTED IN PART AND DENIED IN PART as follows:

• The Court strikes from Plaintiff's June 16, 2017, supplemental discovery response the following language found at ECF #89-6, Pg. ID 1970: "Without waiving its original responses ... or the supplemental response dated April 24, 2017 and May 24, 2017 which, in addition to the Bates pages identified here included request for quotes and correspondence on the terms of the parties agreement." The Court does not strike Plaintiff's objections to the discovery request. • Plaintiff may not amend or supplement its June 16, 2017, supplemental discovery response without leave of Court. • FCA's motion in all other respects is denied.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer